Thursday, June 25, 2009

CAP and TRADE is really Cap Energy and Tax YOU

On June 27, 2009 the House of Representatives will vote on cap-and-trade H.R. 2454.http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/D?d111:1:./temp/~bdn387:@@@D&summ2=m&/bss/111search.html



This is a HUGE energy tax that will cost each family about $2,500 per year. Energy companies will be limited in how much energy they can produce and sell AND be forced to buy "carbon credits" and pass the cost along to consumers. The effect will be higher prices on everything that is processed or shipped such as food, gasoline, furniture, garden supplies, tires, clothes, electronics and home heating fuel, etc. The government will pick winners and losers in terms of which companies get government funding for energy projects. It will effectively eliminate the free market from energy production and distribution in the U.S. and give control to the government.

WE WON'T BECOME LESS DEPENDENT ON FOREIGN FUEL and the number of job losses in the energy sector won't be made up by new jobs in renewable energy development. It's arguable that it will reduce carbon emissions worldwide, but it's sure to hurt the U.S. economy by restricting our greenhouse gas emissions by as much as 97% of 2005 levels.


This is a bad bill. If it only offered incentives to create alternate energy sources, that would be good. But, this draconian and punitive approach to controlling energy production and distribution will be paid for by anyone who drives, turns on a light bulb, runs a computer, eats, you get the picture. And, there is little public debate and no apparent rationale for causing such unnecessary injury to the U.S. energy industry. All of this when the US economy is in crisis with unemployment at almost 10% and our debt load five times higher than it was a year ago.

While President Obama is pushing a nationalized health care program with a free hour on national TV (where the network refuses to air ads in opposition), the IMMEDIATE vote is on the energy tax, which he is not mentioning and a complacent media isn't reporting. PLEASE don't be complacent and call TODAY. Just say NO to the cap and trade energy tax.


If you think your budget is tight now, wait a year if this passes and see how much less you have to help the people you care about.

Earlier this week, Al Gore held a conference call to mobilize more than 10,000 of his Repower America grassroots activists.

When calling, be polite. The Democrats representatives will probably vote for it anyway, but it makes a difference to them as to how many "no" votes they hear from citizens, in terms of the amendments they'll allow. The Senate could shut it down, so be sure to call them now, even though the Bill won't go to them for a vote for a few days.

Senator Mark Udall: 202-224-5941




Senator Michael F. Bennet 202-224-5852 -you'll get a busy signal or no answer. Call the Denver office (303) 455-7600 or send an email at http://bennet.senate.gov/contact/



CD1 Rep. Dianna Degette 202-225-4431 Denver

CD2 Rep. Jared Polis 202-225-2161 Boulder/Broomfield/Grand/Clear Creek/Summit/Eagle/Gilpin

CD 3 Rep. John Salazar 202- 225-4761 Western Slope from Jackson to Las Animas counties

CD 4 Rep. Betsey Markey 202-225-4676 North & Eastern Colorado

CD 5 Rep. Doug Lamborn (202) 225-4422 El Paso, Teller, Lake, Chaffe, Fremont, Park

CD 6 Rep. Mike Coffman (202) 225-7882 Douglas, Arapahoe, Jeffco, Elbert

CD7 Rep. Ed Perlmutter (202) 225-2645 Adams/Jeffco

Wednesday, March 11, 2009

AIG madness

Being in insurance, I have been following AIG. A few months ago, its stock was $52/share; then about a month ago it was $2/share. After putting in about $150 billion into AIG (and now the fed owns about 75% of it), the stock went to 35 cents.

When the feds added another $30 bil at the first of this week, it went all the way to 42 cents.

Plus, there is a strong possibility the feds will put more money into AIG, even though they admit that they're not sure where all of the first 100 billion went.

If you divide the 150 bil by our total population of 300 million (including a large number of children and people who do not pay taxes), you get $500/person or $2,000 for a family of four. I have two questions (A) Is my math right? and (B) Have we lost our minds?

Tuesday, February 17, 2009

Small Biz Opposes Mandatory Paid Sick Leave

The Colorado Republican Business Coalition (CRBC) opposes HB09-1210, which would require companies to give paid sick leave of up to 40 hours a year in companies with six to 15 employees and up to 72 hours a year in companies with 16 or more employees. Key objections include:
  • Small business can rarely compete with the benefits offered by larger companies. Requiring mandatory paid sick leave reduces a competitive advantage for small businesses that typically offer flexibility in the work place as an incentive to good employees.
  • The carry-over provision of allowing paid sick leave to accrue for an indefinite time creates a property right for employees who could demand payment upon severance with the company.
  • There is no time limit on the carry-over provision. Feasibly, an employee could accrue as much as a month or more of time off, couple that with vacation leave, and be on a paid leave for months. This is a big problem for a small business that relies on a stable workforce.
  • It increases record-keeping and overall expenses to small business, thereby increasing costs to consumers without additional profit, which decreases the financial ability to create jobs.
  • Because the language of the Bill is quite broad, it encourages absenteeism as employees take days off for “mental health”.
Once again, the Legislature is offering a solution in search of a problem. Most employers provide benefits and give time off to keep good employees. It is not the role of government to prescribe the relationship between employers and employees. Most new jobs are created by small businesses. In these tough economic times, with unemployment ballooning, forcing punitive legislation such as HB1210 only serves as a disincentive to hire those who may appear less than perfectly healthy or have a history of family health issues.

HB1210 is scheduled to be heard in House Business Affairs & Labor Committee on Wed. Feb. 18. Contact the Committee members and tell them your view of HB1210. Tell them you heard about it from CRBC.

Bill Sponsor: Rep. Ann McGihon 303-866-2921 anne.mcgihon.house@state.co.us
Chairman Joe Rice (D) (D-38 Arap/Jeffco) 303.866.2953 joe.rice.house@state.co.us
Vice Chairman David Balmer (R-39 Arapahoe) 303.866.2935 david.balmer.house@state.co.us
Rep. Laura Bradford (R-55 Mesa) 303.866.2583 laurabradford55@gmail.com
Rep. Sara Gagliardi (D-27 Jefferson) 303.866.2962 sara.gagliardi.house@state.co.us
Rep. Larry Liston (R-16 El Paso) 303.866.2965 larry.liston.house@state.co.us
Rep. Kevin Priola ((R-30 Adams) 303.866.2912 kpriola@gmail.com
Rep. Su Ryden (D-36 Arapahoe) 303.866.2942 mailto:su.ryden.house@state.co.us
Rep. Christine Scanlan (D-56 Eagle/Lake/Summit) 303.866.2952 christine.scanlan.house@state.co.us
Rep. John Soper (D-34 Adams) 303.866.2931 john.soper.house@state.co.us
Rep. Amy Stephens (R-20 El Paso) 303.866.2924 amy.stephens.house@state.co.us


The Colorado Republican Business Coalition was founded in 1992. CRBC tracks legislation affecting taxes, property rights, transportation, energy and health care for the 300+ small business owners and managers members and 2000+ others interested in protecting free enterprise.

Link: http://www.smallbusinessrepublicans.com/issues/HB09-1210-SickLeave.htm